The Netflix vs. Paramount Bidding War Boiled Down to Three Letters: CNN

Mar 2
2 min read

So, the six-month soap opera starring Skydance, Netflix, and Warner Bros. Discovery finally hit the series finale on February 26th.
The plot twist? Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos took a little field trip to the White House to "check the temperature" of the administration. Apparently, the forecast was "Ice Cold with a 100% chance of Antitrust," because Netflix immediately scurried back to the loading dock and dropped their bid.
It doesn’t take a genius to read the room. The White House essentially cleared the runway for David Ellison and Paramount. But why would the administration play favorites?
The "Worthless" Gold Mine
To understand why this happened, we have to look past the streaming wars and look at the linear TV assets. Back in December, David Ellison downplayed the value of WBD’s TV portfolio (HBO, HGTV, TNT, etc.), labeling them as essentially "worthless" in the long term.
However, when asked by CNBC why he wouldn't let WBD spin those networks off into a separate entity to simplify the deal, Ellison’s stance shifted: There is no deal without the networks.
If they are "worthless," why are they the deal-breaker?
The Real Prize: CNN
This isn't about Property Brothers reruns. It’s about CNN.
The Math: Larry Ellison is one of the President’s biggest supporters. His son, David, now runs Paramount.
A Shift in Voice: By moving WBD under the Paramount/Ellison umbrella, the administration effectively transitions one of the most influential global news platforms into the hands of a friendly ally.
The Transformation: It’s no secret that CNN’s coverage has been a thorn in the side of this administration. Under the new Ellison ownership, we can likely expect a total restructuring—moving the network away from its current stance and closer to the model of Fox News.




Comments